Advertising Artificial Intelligence Broadband CyberCrime ecommerce Governement-IT Innovation marketing Networks Projects Regulation Research security Service Providers SocialMedia Software vendors Tech

Budget 2018: Tech Industry Reactions

Parliament

The tech business has given its response to this yr’s Budget unveiled by the chancellor Philip Hammond on Monday.

The Budget 2018 was notable for the tech business because it included various strategic bulletins and additional funding for the sector, together with cyber defence, the UK’s industrial technique, and the so referred to as “digital tax” on massive identify tech companies resembling Amazon, Fb, and Google, to make sure they pay their justifiable share of tax.

Tech’s response was principally constructive for the digital tax initiative on primarily US-based companies, which makes the UK one of many first main economies on the planet to impose such a measure. However no less than one skilled has warned of a potential retaliation by america.

tax

Professional response – Digital tax

“The new digital services tax is interesting as it appears to be an outcome of the recent quarrels that have shaken relationships between European regulators and tech giants – Uber, Google and Facebook to name a few,” Antoine Baschiera, CEO and co-founder of scores company Early Metrics.

“If the tax hinders the growth of these tech leaders, it may also give an edge to smaller tech companies and newcomers,” Baschiera added.

However one other professional referred to as the measure lengthy overdue.

“The Government’s crackdown on tax-dodging digital companies is long overdue,” stated Richard Stables, CEO of Kelkoo. “Google and Amazon have been avoiding tax payments which has given them an unfair edge over the competition. Online retailers’ financial advantage over bricks and mortar competitors is not the reason for the struggle and failure of traditional high street names – that is down to the inability to meet consumer demand for a coherent online strategy and user experience.”

“Retailers who have failed to compete in recent years should be focussing on the mistakes made in terms of marketing and tech upgrades rather than desperately searching for a scapegoat to cover their backs and avoid the ire of shareholders,” stated Stables.

However no less than one professional issued a observe of warning, and stated that the USA might retaliate.

Chris Denning, head of worldwide and company taxation at MHA MacIntyre Hudson, stated that the brand new digital providers tax runs the danger of US retaliation, however the UK could also be seen as main the best way in taxing multinationals pretty.

“The specific details of the digital services tax will follow further consultation but we already know the types of businesses it will apply to, such as search engines, social media platforms and online marketplaces who derive value from their user bases,” stated Denning. “This tallies with the government’s previously expressed views on the types of companies such a tax should apply to, and on what basis.”

“This tax is clearly aimed directly at US technology companies,” Denning added. “When the news sinks in across the pond it could raise the possibility of retaliatory measures from the US government. Dragging the UK into an acrimonious quarrel with one of its largest trading partners is perhaps not what the Chancellor intends.”

“The other side of the argument is that the UK will be seen as leading the way, as with previous measures such as the diverted profits tax and the hybrid mismatch rules,” he added. “Once the UK introduces the tax it is may be thought inevitable that other territories will follow. So any non-levelling of the playing field this may create from UK’s perspective will be hopefully short lived.”

One other professional commented on the general funding in infrastructure enhancements.

“Overall, today’s budget has been good news for UK businesses, with pledges to empower infrastructure, slash business rates for retailers and drive uptake of digital skills,” stated Nick Felton, SVP at MHR Analytics.

“Whilst the introduction of a new digital services tax will sound alarm bells for some in the tech sector, we are yet to hear the specifics of how this measure will work, other than it will be targeted exclusively at larger organisations,” stated Felton.

“What is clear is that with Brexit on the horizon next year, many organisations are preparing for a period of uncertainty, with research suggesting that two thirds are considering boosting IT spending as a precautionary measure,” he stated. “There needs to be more detail in the budget small print about how companies can prepare for these challenges, by boosting technical capabilities and putting data at the heart of financial planning and sustainability.”

One skilled welcomed the digital tax as a approach to “level the playing field” for all.

“The combination of a £1.5 billion investment in the high street and a 2 percent tax on large digital firms, in my opinion, is one of the most aggressive efforts to ‘level the playing field’ between online and offline retail in recent times,” stated Jeremy Gilman, SVP Technique at DMI.

“UK retailers should be viewing these actions as somewhat of a gift,” stated Gilman. “Not only is the Government paying to redevelop the high street in a mould of modern live-work-play experience centres, but it is also adding a new tax to some of the high street’s biggest threats in retail; Google, Amazon, Facebook.”

“With that said, UK retailers should leverage this opportunity to double down on their investments in connected commerce, delivering seamless online-offline experiences that meet customers wherever they are and deliver on the changing needs of today’s consumers,” stated Gilman. “This will require hyper localised marketing, store hours and experiences, customer engagement, merchandising and inventory management and fulfilment – more than likely all converging on consumer mobile devices.”

“Digital will be at the core of the future of the high street – the question is whether today’s retailers will get out ahead of it or be replaced by others that do,” he concluded.

Professional response – Cyber defence

In the meantime different specialists have commented on the extra defence spending, which incorporates extra cash within the price range for the UK to fight cyber warfare.

“We champion any government that commits to plugging the growing cyber skills gap in the UK,” commented John “Lex” Robinson, anti-phishing strategist at Cofense.

“Just earlier this year, MPs accused the government of lacking urgency in its work to tackle the shortage of skilled cybersecurity workers – and with nation state attackers still posing a serious threat to our critical infrastructure – now is the time to address this,” stated Robinson.

“The issue of a skills shortage is being compounded by the ever-changing cybersecurity landscape and the fact attacks – and those behind them – are becoming more sophisticated, complex and diverse,” stated Robinson. “It is clear that more needs to be done to attract, engage and retain cybersecurity talent, and the government must play a role to allow organisations the freedom to make this happen.”

One other skilled welcomed the federal government’s recognition of the necessity to bolster our cyber defences to make sure nationwide safety.

“Against the current backdrop, and in an age of blended warfare, securing a country’s digital assets from cyber attack has never been more important,” stated Russell Haworth, CEO of Nominet. “The Government has been open about the fact the UK is no exception and threats exist which are trying to undermine the national interest.”

“Unfortunately, governments around the world have been drawn into a new arms race and investment is required to keep pace,” stated Haworth. “For this reason, the announcement of further investment into cyber capabilities should be welcomed by anyone who lives or works in the UK. With the Internet now so deeply interwoven into critical national infrastructure, business and the daily lives of the people who live here, it is important to invest to remain relevant and resilient.”

Professional response – Industrial technique

Apart from the digital tax and cyber safety, this yr’s price range additionally included an announcement of a further £1.6bn for the federal government’s Industrial Technique, which it unveiled earlier this yr.

“The uncertainties surrounding Brexit and the country’s weak productivity growth are a black cloud looming above British businesses,” stated Jordan Morrow, international head of knowledge literacy at Qlik. “In recent Budgets, the Government announced investments in a number of technologies to drive productivity and growth in the UK: Osborne highlighted the power of big data, while Hammond announced billions of pounds of investment in AI.”

“Today is no different, with the Chancellor proclaiming that we can solve the productivity challenge if we embrace the future, announcing a further £1.6bn in new investments for the modern industrial strategy and £150m for fellowships to attract the brightest talent from around the world,” stated Morrow.

“However, to truly reap the benefits of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, the Government must ensure that it not only attracts the best technical expertise and invests in technological development, but empowers the entire nation to feel more comfortable with data and the technologies that will underpin the future of work and ensure that the UK is a thriving technology innovator,” stated Morrow.

“With just one in five UK workers confident in their ability to read, understand and communicate with data, British businesses aren’t currently in a position to harness the opportunity presented by these new technology investments,” he warned.

In the meantime one other skilled pointed to the potential of rising applied sciences to rework the best way we reside our lives now.

“The potential of emerging technologies such as blockchain, artificial intelligence and quantum computing to transform the way we live and work has been heralded for some time now and it’s great to see the UK government committing to funding their development,” stated Ian Smith, Founder and CEO of Gospel Know-how.

“This commitment will ensure that the UK continues to lead the innovation and development of these technologies and ensure that we can all enjoy the benefits of the innovation that surrounds us without worrying about the exposure of our sensitive information,” stated Smith.

“As we move into the digital-first age, it is essential that the technologies that underpin how we work together have been designed for the world we live in,” he added. “At the moment, many businesses still rely on technologies designed for an age where things happened differently. A commitment to these emerging technologies is a commitment to more secure and productive experiences for businesses and the general public and that is excellent news.”

Professional response – Rural connectivity

Lastly one professional weighed within the authorities’s goal to drive full fibre connectivity into rural areas.

“Rural connectivity has always been the missing part of the puzzle,” Paul Stobart, CEO of ISP Zen. “For years infrastructure investment has been driven by the need to improve connectivity in big towns and cities, and this investment will go a long way to righting that imbalance.”

“But the Government can’t stop here if it wants to fulfil its pledge of making access to high-speed broadband a legal right for everyone by 2020,” he added.

“In order for the country to use new technologies to grow and prosper we need to continually invest in the areas that will enable this and broadband is at the top of that list,” stated Stobart. “We certainly hope that this investment is a catalyst for a more digitally harmonious Britain.”

What have you learnt about fibre broadband? Take our quiz!