15.6 inch or larger asus Asus ROG gaming ultrabooks Reviews Tech ultrabooks with dedicated graphics

Asus TUF Gaming FX705 review (FX705GM

Asus TUF Gaming FX705 review (FX705GM

This text gathers all our impressions on the 17-inch Asus TUF FX705 mid-range line of gaming laptops.

We’ve spent a number of weeks with a high-end FX705 GM configuration (i7-8750H processor, GTX 1060 graphics, dual-storage) and we acquired to know its robust factors and quirks.

This laptop computer has a couple of aces down its sleeve: the sturdy development, the compact and pretty mild type issue (for a 17-incher), the efficiency, the 144 Hz IPS show and final however not least, the aggressive pricing. It’s not with out flaws or robust rivals although, however it’s nonetheless one of many higher provides in its class and I’d anticipate lots of you to have it in your visor within the months to return.

Learn on to seek out the place the Asus TUF FX705 GM excels, the place it leaves room for enchancment and the way it fares towards the options on the market.

Specs as reviewed

Asus TUF FX705 GM Gaming Laptop computer
Display 17.Three inch, 1920 x 1080 px, 144 Hz, IPS, non-touch, matte
Processor Intel Kaby Lake Core i7-8750H CPU
Vide0 Intel HD 630 + Nvidia GTX 1060 6GB
Reminiscence 16 GB DDR4 (2x DIMMs)
Storage 256 GB SSD (M.2 PCIe) + 1 TB 5400 rpm HDD (2.5″)
Connectivity Gigabit LAN, Wi-fi AC (Intel AC 9560) , Bluetooth 5.zero
Ports 1 x USB-A 2.zero, 2 x USB-A Three.1, HDMI 2.zero, LAN, mic/headphone, Kensington Lock
Battery 64 Wh, 180 W charger
OS Home windows 10
Measurement 400 mm or 15.74” (w) x 280 mm or 11.02” (d) x 27.6 mm or 1.08” (h)
Weight 5.75 lbs (2.6 kg) + 1.1 lbs (.5 kg) for the charger
Extras AURA Four-zone RGB backlit keyboard, webcam, DTS headphone output

Design and exterior

The Asus TUF FX705 is a reasonably skinny, mild and properly constructed pc.

It will get small 7.2 mm bezels across the display, however a thicker 14 mm brow that accommodates the digital camera and microphones, in addition to an enormous chin that pushes the display upwards. That apart, at 5.Eight lbs (2.6 kg), it’s lighter than most different 17-inchers and merely a bit heavier than most mid-range 15-inch laptops.

The decreased measurement and weight, corroborated with the robust lid, make the FX705 an ideal laptop computer for these of you who lug round your laptop computer in your backpack. The TUF collection can also be MIL-STD-810 licensed, which suggests it’s “certified to survive the day-to-day hazard” in response to Asus. All laptops ought to do this imo, however hey, this must be harder and extra dependable than the typical bunch.

The lid is made out of a thick piece of metallic and is far stronger than on different Asus laptops, with virtually not give or flex. The remainder of the development is completely made out of plastic, however it’s principally the harder good high quality variety, and whereas there’s nonetheless some flex within the keyboard deck, this laptop computer feels general sturdy and nicely crafted. A number of the supplies are subjectively ugly although, just like the textured plastic across the display.

This collection can also be cleaner wanting than Asus’s different gaming strains. The FX705 is accessible in Gold Metal or Purple Matter shade schemes, and we obtained the previous, which is usually dark-gray, with a delicate golden ASUS backlit emblem on the hood. It’s lit by the panel, so can’t be switched off, however no less than there are not any different lights and obnoxious design parts to cope with. The Pink Matter model will get a pink backlit emblem and a few red-accents across the lid and on the palm-rest, so isn’t as clear as this one.

So far as practicality goes, the FX705 sits properly on a desk, because of its multitude of rubber ft on the stomach, will get a spacious palm-rest with blunt edges and corners round, and two robust hinges hold the display in place as set-up. They permit to open the show with a single hand and lean again to as much as 145 levels, sufficient for desk use.

I do have to say the awkwardly positioned standing LEDs, simply beneath the display, and the truth that the facility button is all the time lit, which may get annoying when watching a film in a darkish room.

Cooling is extraordinarily necessary on a gaming laptop computer, and the FX705 shares the design with the smaller FX505, with intakes on the stomach, on prime of the keyboard and on the aspect, and outputs on the again edge. We’ll speak in-depth concerning the cooling system and its conduct additional down.

One remaining facet to say right here is the IO, which provides the fundamentals you’ll want on such a pc (3x USB-A slots, HDMI 2.zero, LAN, audio output), however with none USB-C and with no card-reader. On prime of this, all of the connectors are grouped on the left edge, which is sweet information for right-handed customers, however on the similar time may kill this for lefties.

All in all, Asus did good with the TUF FX705. It’s a nicely constructed pc with a reasonably compact and lightweight construct, little design fluff and few ergonomic flaws. It’s nevertheless principally made out of plastic, so it doesn’t really feel as premium as a few of the different choices on the market, and solely will get a really primary set of ports.

Keyboard and trackpad

So far as I can inform, Asus provides the FX705 with two keyboard choices: a pink backlit model and a Four-zone RGB Aura keyboard, just like the one of many ROG GL704 Scar II fashions. We obtained the latter on our unit.

It’s the identical keyboard used on the smaller FX505 model, with a reasonably normal format, however cramped arrow keys and NumPad part. The WASD keys are constructed from clear plastic, which permits the illumination to shine via. RGB Four-zone illumination is carried out with this keyboard variant, controllable by way of the TUF AURA software program that comes preinstalled.

This keyboard felt in a different way than on the FX505 we reviewed some time in the past. There’s much less flex in the primary deck on this unit, however surprisingly that didn’t result in an improved expertise. For me, the keys on the FX705 really feel like they want an uncomfortably robust press to actuate, which corroborated with their 1.Eight mm depth and the truth that I’m used to shorter and softer suggestions, took a toll on each my typing velocity and accuracy.

Asus advertises some kind of overstroke know-how carried out with this keyboard, which in principle ought to assist register strokes with out urgent the keys during, however for some cause that didn’t work as anticipated on this unit.

In conclusion, for me this isn’t the quickest or most snug keyboard to sort on, even with a number of hundreds of phrases within the bag on it. Nevertheless, it you’re coming from an older laptop computer or from a desktop keyboard, you’ll in all probability take pleasure in it. Players will even recognize a few of its options, because the improved reliability (good for as much as 20 million key presses) and n-key rollover.

The clickpad however works very nicely. It’s a fair-sized plastic Synaptics floor with Precision drivers and it handles on a regular basis swipes, gestures and faucets easily and reliably. The bodily clicks are fairly OK as nicely, though a bit on the clunky aspect.


Asus gives the TUF FX705 strains with both a 60 Hz or a 144 HZ 17.Three-inch IPS panel, each with matte finishes. We acquired the latter on our check mannequin.

It’s a quick display with good response occasions, so an awesome choice for players, particularly when paired with the GTX 1060 graphics that may ship sustained frame-rates with most titles. There’s no GSync, so that you’ll nonetheless get some tearing and artifacts in sure circumstances, however these are far much less annoying, and even noticeable, than on a normal 60 Hz display.

The panel’s high quality then again is simply barely above common, with good colours, black-levels and distinction, however moderately low most brightness and a few uniformity points. Particulars under, taken with a Spyder4 sensor:

  • Panel HardwareID:AU Optronics AUO409D (B173HAN04.zero);
  • Protection: 97% sRGB, 70% NTSC, 75% AdobeRGB;
  • Measured gamma: 2.2;
  • Max brightness in the midst of the display: 263 cd/m2 on energy;
  • Distinction at max brightness: 860:1
  • White level: 6800 Okay;
  • Black on max brightness: zero.30 cd/m2.

This panel is properly calibrated out of the field, however you possibly can nonetheless give our calibrated profile a attempt to get a corrected white level and grey ranges.

It’s not going to do something concerning the uniformity, however I reckon that’s a top quality management problem with our specific unit and you must get a greater model in your gadget. Be sure that to check it out and RMA the product in case you draw a brief stick.

Hardware and efficiency

We acquired to check a mid-range configuration of the TUF Gaming FX705 collection, the FX505GM mannequin with the six-core Intel Core i7-8750H processor, 16 GB of RAM (2x DIMMs), twin storage and the Nvidia GTX 1060 6 GB graphics chip.

The included 256 GB PCIe SSD gives quick learn speeds and common writes, however is quicker than the 128 GB model we received on the reviewed FX505 and I’d reckon most will discover it ok. If not, you’ll be able to all the time improve it.

The elements are simply accessible when you get previous the again panel, which is maintain in place by a handful of Philips screws. Inside you’ll discover the 2 reminiscence slots and the 2 storage drives. The CPU and GPU are soldered on the motherboard and non-upgradeable.

So far as efficiency goes, this laptop computer can simply deal with on a regular basis chores, whereas operating cool and quiet. Asus presents three fan profiles: Silent, Balanced and Overboost. I recommend to principally maintain your laptop computer on Balanced, because the administration does a very good job at preserving the followers silent with day by day use and solely kick them on with multitasking and extra demanding masses. Additional down we’ll nevertheless talk about how the Silent and Overboost modes influence the efficiency when enjoying video games.

First, we check the CPU’s efficiency by operating Cinebench R15 Multi-Core a number of occasions in a loop and log the CPU’s frequencies, temperatures and scores.

Out of the field, the i7 in our pattern ramps as much as its most Turbo Increase Frequencies, however shortly reaches 95 levels Celsius and stabilizes at about 2.Eight – Three.1 GHz and a die-temperature of about 70-75 levels Celsius. That is an aggressive limitation, extra aggressive than on the FX505 we examined a couple of weeks in the past, and interprets in scores of solely round 1000 – 1050 factors in concurrent run of the check. Consider our pattern is pre-production, and we anticipate the ultimate retail variations to carry out nearer to the FX505.

Both method, we additionally undervolted the CPU an -100 mV (this text explains what undervolting is and the right way to carry out it) and re-ran the checks. On this case the CPU clocks down a bit slower, and stabilizes at round Three.2-Three.Four GHz after hitting the mid 90s temperature threshold, which interprets in scores of round 1080-1130 factors in concurrent runs.

In different phrases, undervolting results in a slight Three-Eight% efficiency improve in demanding CPU masses, even on this thermally restricted implementation, which bottlenecks the CPU at solely round 75 levels Celsius. For comparability, the identical CPU runs at round 85-90 levels Celsius in different implementations in the identical circumstances, which interprets in higher-frequencies.

We’ve additionally ran our set of ordinary benchmarks, and right here’s what we acquired:

  • 3DMark 11: P12537 (Graphics: 13976, Physics: 9695);
  • 3DMark 13 – Hearth Strike: 9793 (Graphics – 10918, Physics – 15699);
  • 3DMark 13 – Time Spy: 3709 (Graphics – 3566, CPU – 4803);
  • PCMark 08: House Typical – 3984;
  • PCMark 10: 4988;
  • PassMark: Score: 5323, CPU mark: 12057, 3D Graphics Mark: 8608;
  • GeekBench Three.Four.2 32-bit: Single-Core: 3875, Multi-core: 21506;
  • GeekBench Four.1.1 64-bit: Single-Core: 4897, Multi-core: 19042;
  • CineBench R15: OpenGL 99.21 fps, CPU 1131 cb, CPU Single Core 177 cb;
  • x264 HD Benchmark Four.zero 32-bit: Move 1 – 195.22 fps, Move 2 – 63.94 fps.

We additionally ran a few of them on the -100 mV undervolted profile:

  • 3DMark 13 – Hearth Strike: 9843 (Graphics – 11008, Physics – 15793);
  • GeekBench Four 64-bit: Single-Core: 4911, Multi-core: 19394;
  • CineBench R15: OpenGL 95.77 fps, CPU 1191 cb, CPU Single Core 177 cb;
  • x264 HD Benchmark Four.zero 32-bit: Cross 1 – 198.16 fps, Move 2 – 69.61 fps.

Simply as observed within the Cinebench experiment, undervolting interprets in minor enhancements in these checks that put a taxing load on all of the 6 cores of the i7-8750H CPU.

Asus may permit the CPU to spur larger on the ultimate model of the FX705, however on the similar time this limitation is perhaps essential in an effort to hold the GPU at bay in video games. The FX705GM with the i7 CPU and GTX 1060 graphics will get a extra complicated cooling implementation than the TUF FX505GE mannequin examined earlier than, in a barely greater chassis.

Right here’s what we received with this unit, whereas operating Far Cry Four, one of many extra demanding titles on the market, at FHD decision and most settings:

  • out of the field, Balanced fan profile, the CPU stabilizes at round Three.5 GHz / 94 C, and the GPU at 1.62 GHz / 85 C;
  • with the undervolted CPU, Balanced fan profile, the CPU stabilizes at round Three.Eight GHz / 95 C and the GPU at 1.64 GHz / 83 C;
  • activating Overboost minimally decreases the CPU/GPU temperatures by 1-Three levels, with no vital impression on efficiency;
  • on Silent Mode the GPU’s frequency drops to solely about 1.1 GHz, which leads to a big efficiency lower.

The efficiency is fairly good. The GPU drops a bit of bit beneath it most Turbo frequency in gaming periods, however each the CPU and GPU run at very excessive temperatures. Undervolting the CPU permits it to run at most Turbo Frequencies whereas enjoying video games, however has a minor impression on the GPU and general gaming efficiency. Switching to Overboost just about solely leads to a noise improve (as much as 56-57 dB at head degree), whereas switching on Silent makes the laptop computer a lot quieter (42 dB at head degree), however with successful on efficiency.

All in all, the cooling is a limiting issue on this check unit. For comparability, the equally specked ROG GL504 Scar II permits the GPU to take care of quicker speeds of round 1.72 GHz in FarCry, at decrease temperatures (CPU – 80, GPU – 78 C).

The desk under gathers the gaming outcomes of this TUF FX705, in addition to these registered on the ROG GL504 with GTX 1060 graphics and the TUF FX505 with GTX 1050 Ti graphics. The 17-inch mannequin can also be obtainable with 1050 Ti graphics, and these numbers will inform you how the 2 configurations ought to fare one towards the opposite. Don’t clarify the GTX 1050 Ti fashions to run a lot cooler although, as they get an easier cooling design.

FX705 – 1060 FHD Extremely FX505 – 1050 Ti FHD Extremely GL504 – 1060 FHD Extremely
Shadow of Mordor 88 fps 58 fps 102 fps
Tomb Raider 92 fps 64 fps 98 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider 58 fps 44 fps 62 fps
Bioshock Infinite 101 fps 73 fps 109 fps
FarCry Four 76 fps 52 fps 87 fps

Even when it performs 5-10% poorer than with different implementations on this FX705, the GTX 1060 GPU stays a considerably quicker choice than the 1050 Ti various. You’ll nonetheless have to simply accept the excessive CPU/GPU temperatures which in time may result in reliability points, that’s why I’d advocate going for the ROG GL704 Hero II as an alternative for those who’re after a compact 17-incher with GTX 1060 graphics, it’s not only a higher performer, it’s a greater general laptop computer. You’ll nevertheless should pay a premium over the TUF FX705.

Noise, Warmth, Connectivity, audio system and others

Asus carried out a posh cooling answer on the TUF FX705GM, with two giant followers (with mud exhaust channels) and a number of other heatpipes, not similar to the implementation on the ROG GL 2018 collection, however pretty shut. That’s why I discover the excessive CPU/GPU temperatures just a little shocking and I counsel you to additional look into critiques of the ultimate retail fashions to see how these deal with warmth (and the way they carry out).

As talked about earlier than, Asus gives three fan profiles you’ll be able to toggle between: Silent, Balanced and Overboost. I’d advocate retaining Balanced lively on a regular basis.

With day by day use, the CPU fan is lively on a regular basis, however at barely audible ranges in a quiet room, once you’ll fairly hear the spinning HDD’s noise. With video games, the followers ramp as much as about 52 dB at head-level on Balanced and get noisier on Overboost, to about 56-57 dB, however with little to no impression on efficiency. Switching to Silent does make the laptop computer a lot quieter (41-42 dB), however on the similar time takes a big toll on efficiency.

As for the outer shell temperatures, the FX705 stays pretty cool whereas operating video games, with solely sure spots on the underbelly, on prime of the GPU, reaching larger ranges.

*Every day Use – Netflix in EDGE for 30 minutes
*Load – enjoying Far Cry Four for 30 minutes

The TUF FX705 collection will get a Wave 2 Intel Wi-Fi module with Bluetooth 5.zero, alongside Gigabit LAN. Out check unit carried out flawlessly on wi-fi, and identical to the 15-inch FX505 model, is likely one of the quickest laptops we’ve ever examined with out setup, each close to the router and at 30 ft with 2 partitions in between.

The audio system on this unit have been somewhat quieter than these on the FX505, at as much as 76 dB at head-level. The sound nonetheless comes by way of small cuts on the edges and is somewhat tiny, with little on the low-end, however the mids and highs are pretty good. The FX705 additionally retains the power to output encompass sound to headphones and exterior audio system by way of the three.5 mm jack.

The digital camera is positioned on prime of the display, even with the smaller bezels (in contrast to on the GL704s), and gives respectable photographs in properly lit rooms, however pretty washed out.

Battery life

There’s a 64 Wh battery on the Asus TUF FX705, which is about common for a 17-inch laptop computer lately. There’s Optimus on-board, but in addition highly effective hardware and a hungry 144 Hz 17-inch display, so that you’re not going to get nice battery life with this laptop computer.

Right here’s what to anticipate, with the display set at 40%, roughly 120 nits of brightness.

  • 14.5 W (~Four h 25 min of use) – textual content modifying in Google Drive, Higher Battery Mode, display at 40%, Wi-Fi ON;
  • 12.5 W (~5 h of use) – 1080p fullscreen video on Youtube in Edge, Higher Battery Mode, display at 40%, Wi-Fi ON;
  • 12 W (~5 h of use) – Netflix in Edge, Higher Battery Mode, display at 40%, Wi-Fi ON;
  • 12.5 W (~5 h of use) – 4K fullscreen .mkv video within the Film app, Higher Battery Mode, display at 40%, Wi-Fi ON;
  • 18 W (~Three h 30 min of use) – shopping in Edge, Higher Efficiency Mode, display at 40%, Wi-Fi ON;
  • 52 W (~1 h 20 min of use) – gaming on battery, Excessive Efficiency Mode, display at 30%, Wi-Fi ON.

It is best to get longer runs when you go for the 60 Hz display model or change the keyboard’s illumination off.

This specific configuration of the TUF FX505 comes with a 180 Wh energy brick and a full cost takes round 1 hour and 30 minutes.

Worth and availability

The Asus TUF Gaming FX705 isn’t but available in shops on the time of this text (September 2018), however so far as we recognized proper now, is predicted for This fall 2018.

Asus gives configurations with GTX 1050 Ti (FX705GE) and GTX 1060 graphics (FX705GM), and the latter ought to promote for a number of lots of lower than the equally specked ROG GL704 fashions, which begin at $1799 for the 1060 / 144 Hz display configurations.

We’ll replace this part as soon as we all know extra.

Last ideas

Identical to we concluded in our article concerning the 15-inch FX505, the larger 17-inch FX705 collection can also be one of many higher worth units in its class.

It’s compact and nicely constructed, seems easy sufficient that will probably be accepted in stricter work/faculty environments, provides an RGB keyboard and optionally available 144 Hz IPS display, performs pretty nicely, runs cool and lasts for a good whereas on a cost. On the similar time, it does have its quirks: the keyboard requires firmer strokes to actuate, there’s no card-reader or USB-C port, the GTX 1060 GPU solely runs at about 90% of its talents (inside this check unit), the cooling retains the CPU and GPU at excessive temperatures, the audio system are merely common and the IPS display isn’t very shiny or color-uniform.

Given the recent elements and snipped GPU efficiency, I’d primarily advocate going for one of many extra reasonably priced FX705GE configurations with GTX 1050 Ti graphics. The GTX 1060 fashions are undoubtedly higher at dealing with trendy video games, but when the ultimate retail fashions behave like our check unit, I personally wouldn’t be snug with a pc than retains the CPU/GPU at 85-95 C with video games, this will result in reliability points down the street. Thus, I’ll as soon as extra stress to take a look at different evaluations to seek out out precisely how the retail variations of the FX705GM carry out and deal with warmth.

Asus plans to compensate for the FX705’s shortcomings with an aggressive pricing, so as to compete with the opposite reasonably priced 17-inch laptops available on the market. The Lenovo Legion Y730 is an in depth competitor it is best to take a look at when out there, whereas the 17-inch Acer Predator Helios is a less expensive, however bulkier choice, with a smaller battery.

This apart, if the finances permits and also you’re after a GTX 1060 configuration, you also needs to think about units just like the Asus ROG GL704 or the MSI Raider GE73, that are general higher laptops with nicer builds, keyboards, screens and thermals, however not essentially better-value choices in your cash.

This beautiful a lot wraps-up our review of the Asus TUF FX705GM. The feedback part under awaits your suggestions, opinions and questions although, and we’re round to assist out if we will.

Andrei Girbea, Editor-in-Chief of Ultrabookreview.com. I have been overlaying cellular computer systems because the 2000s and you will principally discover evaluations and thorough guides written by me right here on the location.